England’s £9.58bn affordable housing programme: the 33 clients architects should be targeting now
Homes England has named 33 organisations that will receive £9.58bn through the 2026–36 Social and Affordable Homes Programme, providing architects with a clearer picture of where thousands of future housing commissions could emerge over the next decade
The first Strategic Partners include some of England’s largest housing associations and developers, alongside three councils receiving Strategic Partnership status for the first time. Nearly two-thirds of the homes delivered by the partners are expected to be for Social Rent.
Homes England assesses bids against value for money, strategic fit and deliverability, making inclusion on the list a useful indicator of an organisation’s capacity to deliver housing at scale. For architects, the significance is therefore not simply the size of the government’s £39bn housing programme. A substantial part of that funding has now been attached to named organisations with quantified housing commitments and long-term funding certainty.
Homes England has, in effect, published a ten-year shortlist of who intends to build and at what scale.

Jean Carlo via Unsplash
Where the £9.58bn is going
The 33 Strategic Partners will receive £9.58bn for delivery outside London. London is being administered separately by the Greater London Authority, with up to £11.7bn allocated to the capital through the London Social and Affordable Homes Programme.
The largest individual allocations reach £350m, with Orbit Group receiving that amount towards 3,335 homes, Vistry Homes towards 3,028, Clarion Housing Association towards 2,977 and Platform Housing Group towards 2,800.
Together Housing has been allocated £326.6m towards 3,200 homes, while Onward Homes receives £345.1m towards 3,000. Other £350m recipients include Abri, Bromford Flagship Livewest, Karbon Homes, Places for People, Sanctuary, Sage Homes and Stonewater.
These are not project-specific architectural commissions. Strategic Partnership funding is designed to support organisations delivering at programme level over the duration of the SAHP, rather than funding one scheme at a time. That makes the allocations particularly useful as a business-development indicator:
the 33 organisations now need to convert funding commitments into sites, planning permissions, partnerships and built projects.
The 33 clients
For practices deciding where to focus, the useful distinction is not simply the size of each allocation. Geography, development model, existing pipelines and procurement arrangements will determine where architectural work actually emerges.
| Strategic Partner | Homes | Grant | Business-development |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abri Group | 1,967 | £350.0m | South and South West development |
| Accent Housing | 1,340 | £172.4m | Multi-region housing pipeline |
| Amplius Living | 2,500 | £320.5m | Midlands and eastern England |
| Aster Communities | 1,320 | £240.0m | South and South West |
| Bromford Flagship Livewest | 2,629 | £350.0m | Large multi-region programme |
| Cambridge City Council | 803 | £96.4m | New council Strategic Partner |
| Clarion Housing Association | 2,977 | £350.0m | Large-scale development and regeneration |
| Eastleigh Borough Council | 1,042 | £154.4m | New council Strategic Partner |
| EMH Housing & Regeneration | 2,495 | £314.5m | East Midlands |
| Great Places Housing Association | 2,600 | £320.6m | North West and Yorkshire |
| Hyde Housing Association | 2,250 | £349.9m | Southern England |
| Jigsaw Homes North | 1,990 | £249.5m | Greater Manchester and North |
| Karbon Homes | 2,533 | £350.0m | North East |
| Magna Housing | 1,500 | £250.0m | South West |
| Metropolitan Housing Trust | 2,500 | £299.8m | Large development programme |
| Midland Heart | 1,820 | £225.1m | Midlands |
| Newcastle City Council | 966 | £141.4m | New council Strategic Partner |
| Onward Homes | 3,000 | £345.1m | Major North West pipeline |
| Orbit Group | 3,335 | £350.0m | Largest housing commitment |
| Park Properties Housing Association | 1,500 | £148.9m | Partnership-led delivery |
| Places for People | 2,595 | £350.0m | Housing, placemaking and mixed use |
| Platform Housing Group | 2,800 | £350.0m | Major Midlands programme |
| Plymouth Community Homes | 1,500 | £250.0m | Plymouth and South West |
| Sage Homes | 2,772 | £350.0m | Developer partnerships |
| Sanctuary Housing Association | 2,000 | £350.0m | National development programme |
| Stonewater | 2,348 | £350.0m | Land-led housing development |
| Thirteen Housing Group | 2,750 | £349.2m | North East |
| Together Housing | 3,200 | £326.6m | Yorkshire and northern England |
| Torus | 2,865 | £349.9m | Liverpool City Region and North West |
| Vico Homes | 2,200 | £250.0m | Yorkshire |
| Vistry Homes | 3,028 | £350.0m | Partnerships and strategic sites |
| Vivid Housing | 2,482 | £349.9m | Hampshire and southern England |
| Yorkshire Housing | 2,010 | £230.0m | Yorkshire |
Homes and grants are Homes England allocations. Geographic descriptions are business-development indicators based on the organisations’ established areas of operation, rather than confirmed locations for SAHP-funded schemes.
The list suggests several routes to architectural work. National providers such as Clarion, Places for People and Sanctuary offer broad pipelines spanning multiple regions, while Karbon, Thirteen, Torus and Yorkshire Housing are more geographically concentrated, making their development activity potentially easier for regionally focused practices to track.
Vistry presents a different route again. Its partnerships model means work may emerge through projects involving registered providers, councils and private-sector delivery rather than housing-association procurement alone, so practices following Vistry also need to watch the organisations it is partnering with.

Laura Adai via Unsplash
Councils are rebuilding development capacity
Three names are particularly significant. Cambridge City Council, Eastleigh Borough Council and Newcastle City Council are the first councils to receive Strategic Partnership status from Homes England, with allocations of £96.4m, £154.4m and £141.4m respectively.
Their inclusion sits within a wider attempt to rebuild local authority development capacity after decades of comparatively low levels of direct council housebuilding.
That could increasingly make councils housing-development clients, rather than primarily planning authorities, landowners or commissioners of smaller programmes.
The £21.8m Council Housebuilding Support Fund reinforces that direction. Available until 31 March 2029, it is intended to help councils increase direct delivery, expand housing pipelines and establish or grow partnerships and joint ventures with registered providers and developers.
Importantly for the built-environment sector, the fund can itself pay for professional support. Homes England says eligible expenditure can include additional project managers and consultants bringing relevant technical expertise, alongside other pre-development and enabling work.
The fund is aimed at councils at different stages: those already delivering through the 2026–36 Social and Affordable Homes Programme but capable of building more, authorities close to bringing forward new proposals, and councils exploring partnerships with registered providers and developers. Each council can submit a proposal for up to £300,000 in each of the three years.
That means consultancy opportunities could emerge through the capacity-building programme itself. Site studies, development strategy, capacity testing, feasibility and technical work may be required before the housing schemes being developed through it reach conventional architectural procurement.
More than £21bn is still unallocated
The 33 Strategic Partners are only the first identifiable client group. Despite the scale of the £9.58bn announcement, more than £16bn remains to be allocated outside London and around £5bn in London over the programme’s lifetime.
Outside Strategic Partnerships, Homes England is continuing to accept bids through Continuous Market Engagement. This allows organisations to seek funding for individual schemes or portfolios and is particularly relevant to smaller and medium-sized providers, new entrants and local authorities unable to deliver at the scale required for Strategic Partnership funding.
The portfolio route is also designed to help de-risk and accelerate groups of schemes that may be at different stages of development. Homes England says not all need to have secured planning permission or a contractor when the portfolio is agreed, provided there is a credible prospect of delivery.
The £9.58bn announcement should therefore be read as a first wave rather than a finished picture.
Organisations acquiring sites, forming partnerships and preparing viable proposals could become the next significant affordable-housing clients as the remaining funding is allocated.

Connor Gan via Unsplash
Where will the architectural work emerge?
The housing commitments do not translate directly into 33 procurement programmes. Some Strategic Partners already have land, planning applications and established consultant teams, allowing schemes to move comparatively quickly. Others will need to acquire sites, assemble joint ventures or work through complex regeneration proposals before individual building packages appear.
The earliest opportunities may consequently sit upstream of a conventional architectural tender.
Feasibility studies, masterplanning, estate regeneration strategies, design codes, planning, landscape and infrastructure design can all emerge well before the main building commissions.
There is also no single portal through which the resulting work will appear. Practices need to follow the clients themselves: procurement notices and consultant frameworks, but also land acquisitions, planning applications, development agreements and partnerships with councils and housebuilders.
For council-led work, cabinet papers, housing delivery plans and land-disposal decisions can provide earlier signals than formal tenders. The Council Housebuilding Support Fund provides another route to watch, identifying authorities investing in the people and technical capacity required to expand their housing programmes.
What should practices do now?
The £9.58bn allocation gives practices a clear starting point: 33 organisations with long-term funding and commitments to deliver thousands of homes over the next decade.
Their locations, development pipelines, partnerships and procurement activity will help indicate where opportunities for architecture, masterplanning and regeneration are likely to emerge.
The picture will continue to develop. More than £21bn remains unallocated, while councils are being supported to expand their own housing pipelines and delivery capacity. For architects, tracking both the existing Strategic Partners and the organisations securing future funding will provide a clearer view of where England’s next generation of social and affordable housing is taking shape.
Further information
Homes England and National Housing Bank – Investment Prospectus 2026
Useful wider context on Homes England’s investment approach, including the different Strategic Partnership models for registered providers, local authorities and developers.
Homes England – Technical and professional frameworks
Relevant to the article’s architectural and business-development angle, setting out Homes England’s frameworks for procuring technical and professional services.
Research and reporting: Aparna Kher is a Business Development and Bid Coordinator at Beedier, working across architectural research, communications, writing and business development. She holds an MA in History and Critical Thinking in Architecture from the Architectural Association and is the founder of Save Ourselves.