by
© Alexander P Kapp / Plant House, Corporation Park, Blackburn
Corporation Park Conservatory
Conservation architect sought to develop restoration plan for Grade II listed conservatory.
The Conservatory was originally commissioned by Blackburn Corporation as a grand and unique structure to symbolise the success and status of the town and was partly funded through public subscription. The Conservatory was completed in early 1900 and is acknowledged in its listing as a good example of Victorian Conservatory style. It comprises a central double height atrium with two lower wings to east and west. The highly decorated cast iron frame contains areas of wrought iron ornamental infill and sits on a stone and brick plinth.
Following the collapse of the roof of the west wing and subsequent condition survey of the east wing revealing significant corrosion, the Conservatory was closed to public access. The Council is now seeking a conservation architect to devise a sympathetic and sustainable restoration plan for the structure.
There will be a separate tender process for the design and restoration/adaptation works to take forward the chosen option.
Location
Sector
Civic
Website
Tender Portal
Tender Stage
ITT
Deadline
16 December 2024, 12:00 noon (local time)
Project Value/Scale
£136,800
Consultant Team
Conservation Architect
CARE Registered Structural Engineer
MEP
Landscape Architect with conservation specialism
Quantity Surveyor
CARE Registered Structural Engineer
MEP
Landscape Architect with conservation specialism
Quantity Surveyor
Submission Criteria
Applicant details / bidding model
Exclusion declarations
Evidence of financial standing
Three relevant contract examples
£2m PII, £5m Employer’s and Public Liability
Health and Safety Statement
Evidence of listed building experience (20%)
Evidence of restoration experience (15%)
Demonstratable creativity and innovation in introducing new uses to historically important buildings (15%)
Examples of how conservation best practice has been applied to previous projects (15%)
Statement on how key deadlines will be met and perceived risks will be managed (5%)
Team CVs (10%)
Explanation of technological aids to be used to facilitate survey and simulation of heat loss/overheating calculations (5%)
Social Value statement (15%)
Full pricing schedule (Pass/Fail)