Gare d'appalto e concorsi attuali

3 teams will be shortlisted to develop an anonymous ESQ+ (Enhanced Concept Design) proposal.
Each compliant shortlisted team will receive a competition honorarium of up to €145k.
Following the jury’s decision, the client will negotiate the architectural services contract with one or more competition winners.

Deliverabili di qualifica:
— Architect registered and authorised to practise in France (or equivalent professional registration for architects established in another country), acting as lead consultant and group representative.
— Multidisciplinary team demonstrating expertise in: Building services and environmental engineering (including HVAC, water treatment, electrical systems and fire safety); Structural engineering; Sports and aquatic facilities engineering; Highways and utilities; Cost consultancy; Environmental performance and circular economy; Landscape architecture; Acoustics.
— Administrative documentation including DC1/DC2 or ESPD (DUME), financial statements, professional insurance, architect registration, declarations of eligibility and legal standing.
— Evidence of technical capacity, staffing levels and turnover.
— Relevant project references demonstrating experience on aquatic centres or projects of comparable complexity, supported by illustrated reference sheets and presentation material for the lead architect. References in housing or office sectors are expressly excluded.

Fornibili della proposta:
— Complete architectural response demonstrating the project’s spatial organisation, technical feasibility, environmental performance and budget control.
— Executive design statement summarising the architectural, functional, technical and energy strategy.
— Architectural report explaining the design concept, planning compliance, architectural identity, internal organisation and circulation strategy.
— Urban integration statement addressing planning requirements and site context.
— Detailed technical report describing structural and construction systems, materials, engineering solutions and any further technical investigations required.
— Environmental report covering materials, reuse strategy, embodied carbon, energy performance, water management, thermal comfort, daylight, impermeable surface calculations and other sustainability studies required by the programme.
— Building operation and maintenance strategy.
— Area schedule.
— Construction cost estimate with supporting explanation demonstrating compliance with the published works budget.
— Delivery programme and project phasing.
— Anonymous draft appointment documentation and fee allocation schedule.

Graphic submission includes:
— Four vertical A0 presentation boards.
— Site plan at 1:500.
— Floor plans of every level at 1:200.
— All elevations at 1:200.
— Longitudinal and transverse sections at 1:200.
— Four coloured perspectives comprising: One internal aquatic hall view; One internal sports hall view; Two external views illustrating the arrival sequence, public realm integration and outdoor aquatic areas.
— Native CAD files (DWG/DXF), PDF presentation panels and a PowerPoint presentation prepared using the client template.

Invio, formato e requisiti:
— Language of submission: French.
— Stage 2 submissions must remain fully anonymous. Any identifying marks, signatures, names or symbols will result in exclusion.
— Digital submission is mandatory. Graphic boards must additionally be submitted physically in the prescribed formats.
— Methodological documentation is limited to 40 double-sided pages (excluding the appointment document).
— Graphic submission consists of four A0 boards, supported by folded A0 copies, an A3 reduction set, PDF files, native CAD files and the required PowerPoint presentation.

Requisiti di contenuto:
— Integration of the new sports and aquatic complex within its urban setting.
— High-quality architectural design and functional organisation.
— Clear circulation strategies for visitors, athletes, schools, staff and maintenance operations.
— Compliance with planning requirements.
— Robust environmental performance, including low-carbon construction, reuse strategies, energy efficiency and long-term operational sustainability.
— Cost realism and compliance with the published construction budget.
— Durable technical solutions supporting efficient maintenance and long-term operation.

Valutazione:
— Criterion 1: Quality of the response to the programme, including site integration, architectural quality, functional organisation, technical approach, operational strategy and environmental performance.
— Criterion 2: Compatibility with the published construction budget, including the credibility, consistency and robustness of the proposed cost plan and investment strategy. No percentage weightings are published.