The City of Suresnes is procuring architectural and engineering services through a restricted design competition for the demolition and reconstruction of the Raguidelles Sports Centre. The commission concerns the replacement of an existing municipal sports facility and will lead to the award of a subsequent services contract to one of the competition winners. Rather than simply replacing an ageing building, the competition tests how a new public sports facility can respond to contemporary civic expectations while accommodating the functional demands of a municipal sports programme. The architectural challenge lies in reconciling demolition and redevelopment within an established urban setting, delivering a coherent replacement facility capable of supporting long-term public use.<\/p>","sector":["sport-leisure"],"location":"https:\/\/maps.app.goo.gl\/ZJYFAKqaCzWYYK9H8","intervention":"New build","website":"https:\/\/ted.europa.eu\/en\/notice\/-\/detail\/448560-2026","tender_portal":"https:\/\/marches.maximilien.fr\/entreprise\/consultation\/942050?orgAcronyme=u9g","tender_stage":"Two Stage Tender","deadline":"29 Jul 26","contract_type":"","consultant_team":"Architect
\r\nEngineer","submission_criteria":"
3 teams will be shortlisted to develop an anonymous ESQ+ (Enhanced Concept Design) proposal.
\nEach compliant shortlisted team will receive a competition honorarium of up to \u20ac145k.
\nFollowing the jury’s decision, the client will negotiate the architectural services contract with one or more competition winners.<\/p>\n
Qualification Deliverables:<\/strong><\/em> Proposal Deliverables:<\/strong><\/em> Graphic submission includes:<\/strong><\/em> Submission, Format and Requirements:<\/strong><\/em> Content Requirements:<\/strong><\/em> Evaluation:<\/strong><\/em>
\n\u2014 Architect registered and authorised to practise in France (or equivalent professional registration for architects established in another country), acting as lead consultant and group representative.
\n\u2014 Multidisciplinary team demonstrating expertise in: Building services and environmental engineering (including HVAC, water treatment, electrical systems and fire safety); Structural engineering; Sports and aquatic facilities engineering; Highways and utilities; Cost consultancy; Environmental performance and circular economy; Landscape architecture; Acoustics.
\n\u2014 Administrative documentation including DC1\/DC2 or ESPD (DUME), financial statements, professional insurance, architect registration, declarations of eligibility and legal standing.
\n\u2014 Evidence of technical capacity, staffing levels and turnover.
\n\u2014 Relevant project references demonstrating experience on aquatic centres or projects of comparable complexity, supported by illustrated reference sheets and presentation material for the lead architect. References in housing or office sectors are expressly excluded.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 Complete architectural response demonstrating the project’s spatial organisation, technical feasibility, environmental performance and budget control.
\n\u2014 Executive design statement summarising the architectural, functional, technical and energy strategy.
\n\u2014 Architectural report explaining the design concept, planning compliance, architectural identity, internal organisation and circulation strategy.
\n\u2014 Urban integration statement addressing planning requirements and site context.
\n\u2014 Detailed technical report describing structural and construction systems, materials, engineering solutions and any further technical investigations required.
\n\u2014 Environmental report covering materials, reuse strategy, embodied carbon, energy performance, water management, thermal comfort, daylight, impermeable surface calculations and other sustainability studies required by the programme.
\n\u2014 Building operation and maintenance strategy.
\n\u2014 Area schedule.
\n\u2014 Construction cost estimate with supporting explanation demonstrating compliance with the published works budget.
\n\u2014 Delivery programme and project phasing.
\n\u2014 Anonymous draft appointment documentation and fee allocation schedule.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 Four vertical A0 presentation boards.
\n\u2014 Site plan at 1:500.
\n\u2014 Floor plans of every level at 1:200.
\n\u2014 All elevations at 1:200.
\n\u2014 Longitudinal and transverse sections at 1:200.
\n\u2014 Four coloured perspectives comprising: One internal aquatic hall view; One internal sports hall view; Two external views illustrating the arrival sequence, public realm integration and outdoor aquatic areas.
\n\u2014 Native CAD files (DWG\/DXF), PDF presentation panels and a PowerPoint presentation prepared using the client template.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 Language of submission: French.
\n\u2014 Stage 2 submissions must remain fully anonymous. Any identifying marks, signatures, names or symbols will result in exclusion.
\n\u2014 Digital submission is mandatory. Graphic boards must additionally be submitted physically in the prescribed formats.
\n\u2014 Methodological documentation is limited to 40 double-sided pages (excluding the appointment document).
\n\u2014 Graphic submission consists of four A0 boards, supported by folded A0 copies, an A3 reduction set, PDF files, native CAD files and the required PowerPoint presentation.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 Integration of the new sports and aquatic complex within its urban setting.
\n\u2014 High-quality architectural design and functional organisation.
\n\u2014 Clear circulation strategies for visitors, athletes, schools, staff and maintenance operations.
\n\u2014 Compliance with planning requirements.
\n\u2014 Robust environmental performance, including low-carbon construction, reuse strategies, energy efficiency and long-term operational sustainability.
\n\u2014 Cost realism and compliance with the published construction budget.
\n\u2014 Durable technical solutions supporting efficient maintenance and long-term operation.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 Criterion 1: Quality of the response to the programme, including site integration, architectural quality, functional organisation, technical approach, operational strategy and environmental performance.
\n\u2014 Criterion 2: Compatibility with the published construction budget, including the credibility, consistency and robustness of the proposed cost plan and investment strategy. No percentage weightings are published.<\/p>\n","beedier_commentary":"","calendar_date":"20260729","region":"europe","country":"france","type":"open-design-competition","value":"twenty-five-to-fifty-million","tender_source":"","tender_status":"","batch_id":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tenders\/53449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tenders"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tenders"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tenders\/53449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53494,"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tenders\/53449\/revisions\/53494"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"tender-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beedier.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tender-categories?post=53449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}